헤파린 부착 JO스텐트와 미부착 JO스텐트 삽입술 후의 장기 추적 성적 비교

Other Titles
Comparison of Long Term Follow-up Outcomes after Heparin- coated JO stent™ and Un-coated JO stent™ Implantation
Authors
남창욱김권배김기영김성열권택근이영수조봉기손봉준한성욱김기식김윤년
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Issue Date
2000
Citation
Keimyung Medical Journal, Vol.19(2) : 193, 2000
Abstract
The risk of acute or subacute closure after angioplasty has been minimized by using stent deployment. However, restenosis rating 20% ∼30% after stenting is still most important limiting factor for stenting. We investigated a long-term effect of implantation of a heparin-coated JO stent compared with the use of un-coated JO steno. Thirty eight patients were assigned heparin-coated JO stent{21 patients, JO(H)} or uncoated JO stent(17 patients, JO). All clinical and angiographic parameters were retrogradely reviewed. They were followed up monthly and performed follow-up coronary angiography 7 months later. The clinical and angiographic parameters were statistically not different between two groups, except hypertension {JO:18%, JO(H):52%, p<0.05}. The reference diameter was 3.12±0.53mm in 10 and 2.85 ±0.43mm in JO(H) (p=0.071). The minimum luminal diameter after stenting was not significantly different{2.91±0.52mm in JO, 2.78±0.42mm in JO(H), p=0.381}. The restenosis rate of JO was 32% and JO(H), 35%(p=0.545). Over seven months follow up, it seems that a strategy of elective stenting with heparin-coated JO stent was not more effective than uncoated JO stent.
Keywords
Heparin-coated stentRestenosis
URI
http://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/15197
Appears in Collections:
1. Journal Papers (연구논문) > 1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
2. Keimyung Medical Journal (계명의대 학술지) > 2000
Keimyung Author(s)
남창욱; 김권배; 김기식; 김윤년; 한성욱
File in this Item
19-193.pdf(961.4 kB)Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE