계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Prediction model and risk score for perforation in patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Metadata Downloads
Affiliated Author(s)
조광범
Alternative Author(s)
Cho, Kwang Bum
Journal Title
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN
0016-5107
Issued Date
2016
Keyword
AUC (area under the curve)CI (confidence interval)ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection)LST (laterally spreading tumor)LST-G (laterally spreading tumorgranular type)LST-NG (laterally spreading tumornongranular type)OR (odds ratio)ROC (receiver operating characteristic)SD (standard deviation)SE (standard error)
Abstract
Background and Aims : Perforation is the adverse event of greatest concern during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Accurate risk prediction of perforation may enable prevention strategies and selection of the most efficient therapeutic option. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for ESD-induced perforation.

Methods : A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed on 2046 patients who underwent colorectal ESD at 9 Korean ESD Study Group–affiliated hospitals. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into either a derivation set or a validation set. In the derivation set, a prediction score was constructed to assess the risk of perforation using preoperative and procedural-related predictors selected via logistic regression. Discrimination and calibration of the prediction model was assessed using the validation set.

Results : An ESD-induced perforation occurred in 135 patients (6.6%). In the derivation set, multivariate logistic regression identified endoscopist experience (≥50 ESDs: odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.00), tumor size (+1-cm increments: OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62), colonic location (OR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.24-3.89), and submucosal fibrosis (OR = 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04-3.87) as predictive factors (C-statistic = 0.678; 95% CI, 0.617-0.739). In the validation set, the model showed good discrimination (C-statistic = 0.675; 95% CI, 0.615-0.735) and calibration (P = .635). When a simplified weighted scoring system based on the OR was used, risk of perforation ranged from 4.1% (95% CI, 2.8%-5.9%) in the low-risk group (score ≤4) to 11.6% (95% CI, 8.5%-15.6%) in the high-risk group (score >4).



Conclusions


This study developed and internally validated a score consisting of simple clinical factors to estimate the risk of colorectal ESD-induced perforation. This score can be used to identify patients at high risk before colorectal ESD
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Publisher
School of Medicine
Citation
Sung Noh Hong et al. (2016). Prediction model and risk score for perforation in patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 84(1), 98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.011
Type
Article
ISSN
0016-5107
DOI
10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.011
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/32761
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.