An opportunity in difficulty: Japan–Korea–Taiwan expert Delphi consensus on surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract

Background We previously identified 25 intraoperative findings during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as potential indicators of surgical difficulty per nominal group technique. This study aimed to build a consensus among expert LC surgeons on the impact of each item on surgical difficulty. Methods Surgeons from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan (n = 554) participated in a Delphi process and graded the 25 items on a seven-stage scale (range, 0–6). Consensus was defined as (1) the interquartile range (IQR) of overall responses ≤2 and (2) ≥66% of the responses concentrated wi thin a median  1 after stratification by workplace and LC experience level. Results Response rates for the first and the second-round Delphi were 92.6% and 90.3%, respectively. Final consensus was reached for all the 25 items. ‘Diffuse scarring in the Calot’s triangle area’ in the ‘Factors related to inflammation of the gallbladder ’ category had the strongest imp act on surgical difficulty (median, 5; IQR, 1). Surgeons agreed that the surgical difficulty increases as more fibrotic change and scarring develo p. The median point for each item was set as the difficulty score. Conclusions A Delphi consensus was reached among expert LC surgeons on the impact of intraoperative findings on surgical difficulty.