계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

유방암의 치료에 있어서 유방보존술과 변형근치유방절제술의 비교

Metadata Downloads
Affiliated Author(s)
김유사김진희
Alternative Author(s)
Kim, You SahKim, Jin Hee
Journal Title
Keimyung Medical Journal
Issued Date
2002
Keyword
Breast cancerBreast conservation therapySurvival rate
Abstract
Modern prospective studies have demonstrated that breast conservation
procedure (BCP) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) produce comparable
actuarial survival rates. This study was designed to evaluate the merit of
BCP in the treatment of breast cancer. 134 patients underwent BCP during the
period of Aug. 1987 to Aug. 2000 (BCP group), and they were compared with
patients who underwent MRM during the same period (MRM group). Tumor size,
lymph node status and age were similar between the two groups. The clinicopathologic
features, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, actuarial overall
survival rate and disease-free survival rate were analyzed. The mean age of the
BCP group was 44.6 yrs, and that of the MRM group was 44.8 yrs. The mean size
of tumor was 1.89 cm in the BCP group and 1.92 cm in the MRM group. Among
the 134 patients in the BCP group, no lymph node metastasis was observed in 92
(68.7%), 1-3 lymph node(s) in 26 (19.4%), and more than 4 lymph nodes in 16
(11.9%). In the MRM group, the numbers were the same. In the BCP group, the
actuarial 5-yr overall survival rate was 88.20% and the 5-yr disease-free survival
rate was 84.2%. For the MRM group, the actuarial 5-yr overall survival rate was
85.7% and 5-yr disease-free survival rate was 80.4%, showing no significant difference
between two groups. Thirteen in the 134 BCP group and five in the 134
MRM group had locoregional recurrences and five in the 134 BCP group and 17 in the 134 MRM group had distant metastases. The above results suggest that BCP can be a
standard surgical treatment modality for most patients with early stage breast cancer.
Alternative Title
Comparison of
Breast Conservation Procedure with Modified
Radical Mastectomy in Treatment of Breast Cancer
Department
Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학)
Publisher
Keimyung University School of Medicine
Citation
김대동 et al. (2002). 유방암의 치료에 있어서 유방보존술과 변형근치유방절제술의 비교. Keimyung Medical Journal, 21(1), 83–90.
Type
Article
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/15243
Appears in Collections:
2. Keimyung Medical Journal (계명의대 학술지) > 2002
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학)
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.