계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Kwang-il KimMi-SeungShinSang-HyunIhmHo-JoongYounKi-ChulSungShung ChullChaeChang-WookNamHongSeogSeoSeong-MiParkMoo-YongRheeMooHyunKimKwangSooChaYong-JinKimJae-Joong KimKookJinChunByung-SuYooSunghaParkEun-SeokShinDong-Soo KimDooIlKimKyeHunKimSeung-JaeJooJin-OkJeongJinho ShinCheolHoKim
Keimyung Author(s)
Nam, Chang Wook
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Clinical Therapeutics
Issued Date
2016
Volume
38
Issue
10
Keyword
amlodipineangiotensin II type 1 receptor blockersantihypertensiveblood pressurecombinationfimasartan
Abstract
Purpose :
The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the blood pressure–lowering efficacy of fimasartan/amlodipine combination therapy was superior to that of fimasartan monotherapy after 8 weeks of treatment in patients with hypertension who had failed to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy.

Methods :
This trial was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, Phase III clinical study. Patients who failed to respond after 4 weeks of treatment with 60 mg daily of fimasartan (sitting systolic blood pressure [SiSBP]) ≥140 mm Hg) were randomized to receive either daily fimasartan 60 mg or fimasartan/amlodipine 60 mg/10 mg. The primary efficacy end point was the change in SiSBP from baseline to week 8. Secondary end points included the change in SiSBP from baseline to week 4, the changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline to weeks 4 and 8, and the response rate (SiSBP <140 mm Hg or decrease in SiSBP ≥20 mm Hg) or control rate (SiSBP <140 mm Hg) at week 8. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed.
Findings : Of 143 patients randomized to treatment, 137 patients who had available efficacy data were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 59.1 (8.9) years, and 100 (73.0%) were male. Baseline SiSBP and sitting diastolic blood pressure were 150.6 (9.2) mm Hg and 91.7 (8.6) mm Hg, respectively. In the fimasartan/amlodipine combination group, a greater reduction in SiSBP from baseline to week 8 was observed compared with the fimasartan group (7.8 [13.3] mm Hg in the fimasartan group vs 20.5 [14.6] mm Hg in the fimasartan/amlodipine group; P < 0.0001). This reduction was observed after 4 weeks. The mean SiSBP changes from baseline to week 4 were 8.1 (15.8) mm Hg in the fimasartan group and 20.1 (14.7) mm Hg in the fimasartan/amlodipine group (P < 0.0001). At week 8, the response rate was significantly higher in the fimasartan/amlodipine (82.1%) group than in the fimasartan (32.9%) group (P < 0.0001). The control rate at week 8 was also higher in the fimasartan/amlodipine (79.1%) group than in the fimasartan (31.4%) group (P < 0.0001). Adverse drug reactions were observed in 9 patients (6.3%), with no significant differences between treatment groups. There were no serious adverse events associated with the study drugs.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
남창욱
Publisher
School of Medicine
Citation
Kwang-il Kim et al. (2016). A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy. Clinical Therapeutics, 38(10), 2159–2170. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.008
Type
Article
ISSN
0149-2918
Source
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0149291816304519
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.008
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/32743
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.