Recanalization Rate and Clinical Outcome in Acute Carotid-T Occlusion
- Author(s)
- Noh Y.; Jung C.K.; Hong J.-H.; Jeong J.-H.; Chang J.Y.; Kim B.J.; Bae H.-J.; Kwon O.-K.; Oh C.W.; Han M.-K.
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Hong, Jeong Ho
- Department
- Dept. of Neurology (신경과학)
- Journal Title
- European Neurology
- Issued Date
- 2015
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1-2
- Keyword
- Thrombolysis; Recanalization; Carotid-T occlusion; Acute stroke treatment; Cerebral infarction; Outcome
- Abstract
- Background: Acute carotid-T occlusion results in both low recanalization rates and poor outcomes. We investigated clinical outcomes and recanalization in a rare case of thrombolytic therapy. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with acute carotid-T occlusion who were treated with either bridging intravenous (IV) plus intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis or IA alone were analyzed. Complete recanalization was defined as a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grade of 3. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤2. Results: Of the 40 patients, 6 (15%) had favorable outcomes, and 34 (85%) had poor outcomes. Favorable outcomes were significantly associated with a lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score after revascularization treatment and higher rates of complete recanalization (p < 0.01, p < 0.024, respectively). Complete recanalization was achieved in all patients with favorable clinical outcomes and 5 (83%) patients had received combined IV/IA thrombolysis (p = 0.381). Conclusions: The results suggest that complete recanalization for acute carotid-T occlusion improves clinical outcomes. In that regard, bridging IV/IA thrombolysis may be more efficacious than IA alone.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.