Clinical outcomes of the intra-aortic balloon pump for resuscitated patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest.
- Author(s)
- Hyun Kuk Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Youngkeun Ahn; Doo Sun Sim; Shung Chull Chae; Young Jo Kim; Seung Ho Hur; In Whan Seong; Taek Jong Hong; Dong Hoon Choi; Myeong Chan Cho; Chong Jin Kim; Ki Bae Seung; Yang Soo Jang; Seung Woon Rha; Jang Ho Bae; Jeong Gwan Cho; Seung Jung Park
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Hur, Seung Ho
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- Journal of Cardiology
- Issued Date
- 2016
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Keyword
- Cardiogenic shock; Myocardial infarction; Intra-aortic balloon pump
- Abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects of intra-aortic balloon pump
(IABP) in patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before procedure.
Methods and results: Between November 2005 and April 2014, 49,542 patients were enrolled in a
prospective cohort study for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Korea (KAMIR). CPR was performed in
1700 patients with cardiac arrest. Patients were excluded from the study if they had not undergone a
coronary angiogram, if extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or thrombolysis was performed, and if
mechanical complications presented. The primary end point was 1-month all-cause mortality. A total of
883 patients in the IABP group and 476 in the control group were included. During the 1-month followup,
all-cause death occurred in 749 patients (55.1%). The IABP group was predominantly male and had a
higher prevalence of ST-segment elevation MI and a higher risk of coronary lesions including left main
disease and three-vessel disease. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was administered less in the non-IABP
group. In the total population, the IABP group had worse outcomes in terms of mortality rates after
multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.47, p = 0.034] without
increasing the incidence of recurrent MI, stroke, and major bleeding. After propensity matching with a pair of 452 patients, no significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics or clinical
outcomes (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.93–1.57, p = 0.158).
Conclusion: The use of IABP did not show clinical benefits in patients with AMI complicated by severe
cardiogenic shock after propensity matching analysis.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.