Comparisons of Everolimus and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Author(s)
- KANG-YIN CHEN; SEUNG-WOON RHA; YONG-JIAN LI; GUANG-PING LI; DONG JOO OH; MYUNG HO JEONG; YOUNG JO KIM; SEUNG HO HUR; JANG HO BAE; TAE HOON AHN; KOREA ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION REGISTRY INVESTIGATORS
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Hur, Seung Ho
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- Journal of Interventional Cardiology
- Issued Date
- 2015
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Abstract
- Background: It has been established that the newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) everolimus-eluting stent
(EES) is superior to the first-generation DES paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). However, the advantages of EES over
PES in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) need to be fully elucidated.
Methods: The present analysis enrolled 2,911 AMI patients receiving PES (n¼1,210) or EES (n¼1,701) in a largescale,
prospective, multicenter Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). Propensity score matching
was used to adjust for baseline biases in clinical and angiographic characteristics, yielding a total of 2,398 patients
(1,199 receiving PES and 1,199 receiving EES). Various clinical outcomes at 1 year were compared between the two
propensity score matched groups. Target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as the composite of cardiac death,
recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction (Re-MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups after
propensity score matching. Clinical outcomes of the propensity score matched patients showed that the rates of inhospital
and 1-year cardiac and all-cause death were similar between the two groups. But patients in the EES group
had significantly lower incidences of Re-MI (1.4% vs 2.8%, P¼0.002), TLR (1.2% vs 3.1%, P¼0.001), TLF (6.4%
vs 10.2%, P¼0.001), and probable or definite stent thrombosis (0.3% vs 1.8%, P<0.001) than did those in the PES
group.
Conclusions: The present propensity matched analysis suggests that the use of EES in the setting of AMI appears to
be superior to PES in reducing TLF, and stent thrombosis.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.