계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Randomized Comparisons Between Different Stenting Approaches for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions With or Without Side Branch Stenosis

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Young-Hak KimJae-Hwan LeeJae-Hyung RohJung-Min AhnSung-Han YoonDuk-Woo ParkJong-Young LeeSung-Cheol YunSoo-Jin KangSeung-Whan LeeCheol Whan LeeKi Bae SeungWon-Yong ShinNae-Hee LeeBong-Ki LeeSang-Gon LeeChang-Wook NamJunghan YoonJoo-Young YangMin-Su HyonKeun LeeJae-Sik JangHyun-Sook KimSeong-Wook ParkSeung-Jung Park
Keimyung Author(s)
Nam, Chang Wook
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Issued Date
2015
Volume
8
Issue
4
Keyword
bifurcationcoronary artery diseaserestenosisstent
Abstract
Objectives:

This study sought to evaluate the optimal percutaneous coronary intervention techniques using drug-eluting stents for bifurcation coronary lesions.


Background
:
The optimal bifurcation stenting technique needs to be evaluated.


Methods:

The trial included 2 randomization studies separated by the presence of side branch (SB) stenosis for patients having non–left main bifurcation lesions. For 306 patients without SB stenosis, the routine final kissing balloon or leave-alone approaches were compared. Another randomization study compared the crush or single-stent approaches for 419 patients with SB stenosis.


Results:

Between the routine final kissing balloon and leave-alone groups for nondiseased SB lesions, angiographic restenosis occurred in 17.9% versus 9.3% (p = 0.064), comprising 15.1% versus 3.7% for the main branch (p = 0.004) and 2.8% versus 5.6% for the SB (p = 0.50) from 214 patients (69.9%) receiving 8-month angiographic follow-up. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization over 1 year was 14.0% versus 11.6% between the routine final kissing balloon and leave-alone groups (p = 0.57). In another randomization study for diseased SB lesions, 28.2% in the single-stent group received SB stents. From 300 patients (71.6%) receiving angiographic follow-up, between the crush and single-stent groups, angiographic restenosis rate was 8.4% versus 11.0% (p = 0.44), comprising 5.2% versus 4.8% for the main branch (p = 0.90) and 3.9% versus 8.3% for the SB (p = 0.12). One-year major adverse cardiac events rate between the crush and single-stent groups was 17.9% versus 18.5% (p = 0.84).


Conclusions:

Angiographic and clinical outcomes were excellent after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents with any stent technique for non–left main bifurcation lesions once the procedure was performed successfully.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
남창욱
Publisher
School of Medicine
Citation
Young-Hak Kim et al. (2015). Randomized Comparisons Between Different Stenting Approaches for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions With or Without Side Branch Stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 8(4), 550–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.016
Type
Article
ISSN
1936-8798
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.016
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/33906
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.