Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea
    
    
    
- Author(s)
- Kyu-Chul Kang; Gyu Seok Cho; Sang Uk Han; Wook Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Min-Chan Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Seong Yeob Ryu; Seung Wan Ryu; Hyuk Joon Lee; Kyo Young Song; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Ryu, Seung Wan
- Department
- Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
- Journal Title
- Surgical Endoscopy
- Issued Date
- 2011
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Keyword
- Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Billroth I reconstruction; Billroth II reconstruction; Complications
- Abstract
- Background Since reconstruction after laparoscopyassisted
 distal gastrectomy (LADG) is performed through
 a small minilaparotomy window, the clinical course and
 complication rate are influenced by clinical technical
 expertise and experience. The aim of this study was
 to compare postoperative complications and survival
 rates of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after
 LADG.
 Patients and methods We retrospectively collected data
 from 1,259 patients who underwent LADG performed by
 ten surgeons at ten hospitals between April 1998 and
 December 2005. Patients were classified into two groups
 according to reconstruction method used: the Billroth I
 group (n = 875) and the Billroth II group (n = 384).
 Patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and
 postoperative complications were analyzed.
 Results Billroth II reconstruction was performed on obese
 patients (p = 0.003) and patients with more advanced
 tumors (p\0.001). Billroth I reconstruction was performed
 more frequently in the lower portion of the stomach
 (p\0.001) and yielded shorter operating times. The
 postoperative complication rate was 11.4% in the Billroth I
 group, which was lower than that in the Billroth II group
 (16.9%) (p = 0.011). However, the differences in the
 major complication rates were not statistically significant
 (p = 0.263). Of the intra-abdominal complications, intraluminal
 or intraperitoneal bleeding was the most frequent
 complication in the Billroth I group and duodenal stump
 leakage was the most frequent in the Billroth II group. The
 postoperative mortality rate did not show a statistically
 significant difference.
 Conclusions Both Billroth I and Billroth II techniques are
 feasible and safe reconstruction methods after LADG for gastric cancer. To reduce major complication rates, surgeons
 should pay attention to bleeding in Billroth I reconstruction
 and stump leakage in Billroth II reconstruction.
 Keywords Laparoscopic gastrectomy   Gastric cancer
 Billroth I reconstruction   Billroth II reconstruction
 Complications
 
- 공개 및 라이선스
- 
- 파일 목록
- 
 
        
        
        
        Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.