계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Comparison of different nutritional assessments in detecting malnutrition among gastric cancer patients

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Seung Wan RyuIn Ho Kim
Keimyung Author(s)
Ryu, Seung WanKim, In Ho
Department
Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
Journal Title
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Issued Date
2010
Volume
16
Issue
26
Keyword
GastrectomyMalnutritionNutritional assessmentNutritional risk screeningPostoperative follow upSubjective global assessment
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of preoperative and
postoperative malnutrition and the relationships be-
tween objective and subjective nutritional assessment
of gastric cancer patients.
METHODS: From October 2005 to July 2006, we stud-
ied 80 patients with no evidence of recurrent disease
and no loss to follow-up after curative surgery for gas-
tric cancer. In this group, 9 patients underwent total
gastrectomy and 71 patients subtotal gastrectomy. At
admission, 6 and 12 mo after surgery, the patients were
assessed on the subjective global assessment (SGA),
nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), nutritional risk
index (NRI) and by anthropometric measurements and
laboratory data. Differences between the independent
groups were assessed with the Student’s t test and one-
way analysis of variance. Spearman’s rank correlation
coefficients were calculated to evaluate the association
between the scores and variables.
RESULTS: The prevalence of malnutrition at admission
was 31% by SGA and 43% by NRS-2002. At admission,
the anthropometric data were lower in the malnourished
groups defined by the SGA and NRS-2002 assessments,
but did not differ between the groups using the NRI as-
sessment. Body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI),
triceps skin fold and midarm circumference were signifi-
cantly reduced, but the total lymphocyte count, albu-
min, protein, cholesterol and serum iron levels did not
decrease during the postoperative period. Six months
after surgery, there was a good correlation between the
nutritional assessment tools (SGA and NRS-2002) and
the other nutritional measurement tools (BW, BMI, and
anthropometric measurements). However, 12 mo after
surgery, most patients who were assessed as malnour-
ished by SGA and NRS-2002 had returned to their pre-
operative status, although their BW, BMI, and anthro-
pometric measurements still indicated a malnourished
status.
CONCLUSION: A combination of objective and subjec-
tive assessments is needed for the early detection of the
nutritional status in case of gastric cancer patients after
gastrectomy.
© 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
Key words: Gastrectomy; Malnutrition; Nutritional assess-
ment; Nutritional risk screening; Postoperative follow up;
Subjective global assessment
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
류승완
김인호
Publisher
School of Medicine
Citation
Seung Wan Ryu and In Ho Kim. (2010). Comparison of different nutritional assessments in detecting malnutrition among gastric cancer patients. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 16(26), 3310–3317. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i26.3310
Type
Article
ISSN
1007-9327
DOI
10.3748/wjg.v16.i26.3310
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/34810
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.