Comparison of different nutritional assessments in detecting malnutrition among gastric cancer patients
- Author(s)
- Seung Wan Ryu; In Ho Kim
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Ryu, Seung Wan; Kim, In Ho
- Department
- Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
- Journal Title
- World Journal of Gastroenterology
- Issued Date
- 2010
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 26
- Keyword
- Gastrectomy; Malnutrition; Nutritional assessment; Nutritional risk screening; Postoperative follow up; Subjective global assessment
- Abstract
- AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of preoperative and
postoperative malnutrition and the relationships be-
tween objective and subjective nutritional assessment
of gastric cancer patients.
METHODS: From October 2005 to July 2006, we stud-
ied 80 patients with no evidence of recurrent disease
and no loss to follow-up after curative surgery for gas-
tric cancer. In this group, 9 patients underwent total
gastrectomy and 71 patients subtotal gastrectomy. At
admission, 6 and 12 mo after surgery, the patients were
assessed on the subjective global assessment (SGA),
nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), nutritional risk
index (NRI) and by anthropometric measurements and
laboratory data. Differences between the independent
groups were assessed with the Student’s t test and one-
way analysis of variance. Spearman’s rank correlation
coefficients were calculated to evaluate the association
between the scores and variables.
RESULTS: The prevalence of malnutrition at admission
was 31% by SGA and 43% by NRS-2002. At admission,
the anthropometric data were lower in the malnourished
groups defined by the SGA and NRS-2002 assessments,
but did not differ between the groups using the NRI as-
sessment. Body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI),
triceps skin fold and midarm circumference were signifi-
cantly reduced, but the total lymphocyte count, albu-
min, protein, cholesterol and serum iron levels did not
decrease during the postoperative period. Six months
after surgery, there was a good correlation between the
nutritional assessment tools (SGA and NRS-2002) and
the other nutritional measurement tools (BW, BMI, and
anthropometric measurements). However, 12 mo after
surgery, most patients who were assessed as malnour-
ished by SGA and NRS-2002 had returned to their pre-
operative status, although their BW, BMI, and anthro-
pometric measurements still indicated a malnourished
status.
CONCLUSION: A combination of objective and subjec-
tive assessments is needed for the early detection of the
nutritional status in case of gastric cancer patients after
gastrectomy.
© 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
Key words: Gastrectomy; Malnutrition; Nutritional assess-
ment; Nutritional risk screening; Postoperative follow up;
Subjective global assessment
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.