Distal protection device protects microvascular integrity during primary
percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: A prospective,
randomized, multicenter trial
- Author(s)
- Seung-Ho Hur; Kwon-Bae Kim; Bon-Kwon Koo; Seung-Hwan Lee; Junghan Yoon; Seung-Jea Tahk; Byoung-Joo Choi; So-Yeon Choi; Myeong-Ho Yoon; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Geu-Ru Hong; Young-Jo Kim
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Hur, Seung Ho; Kim, Kwon Bae
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Cardiology
- Issued Date
- 2008
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 2
- Abstract
- Background: Distal protection during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the subject of recent controversy. The
present study was designed to determine whether the distal embolic protection preserves myocardial microvascular integrity and improves
clinical outcomes in patients with AMI.
Methods: A total of 116 AMI patients presenting within 12 h of onset of symptoms were enrolled at 7 angioplasty centers. They were
randomly assigned to either primary angioplasty with distal protection group (DP; n=60) or angioplasty alone group (Controls; n=56).
Results: After primary angioplasty, achievement of final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 and TIMI Myocardial
Perfusion (TMP) grade 3 were more frequent in the DP group than in the control group [58/60 (96%) vs. 43/56 (81%), p=0.016; and 39/60
(65%) vs. 20/56 (38%), p=0.001, respectively]. After primary angioplasty, the baseline and hyperemic averaged peak velocities were
significantly higher (23.2±11.5 vs. 18.0±6.9 cm/s, p=0.029; and 39.2±16.7 vs. 30.6±10.8 cm/s, p=0.014, respectively) and the baseline
and hyperemic microvascular resistance indices were significantly lower (4.18±2.22 vs. 5.34±2.25 mm Hg cm−1 s, p=0.036; and 2.38±
1.39 vs. 3.11±1.32 mm Hg cm−1 s, p=0.030, respectively) in the DP group. Patients in the DP group showed more favorable phasic
coronary flow pattern in diastolic deceleration time (679±262 vs. 519±289 ms, p=0.035; and 751±246 vs. 616±269 ms, p=0.035,
respectively). Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months occurred with similar frequency in both groups (8.7% vs. 11.1%, p=0.400).
Conclusions: Distal protection device effectively preserves microvascular integrity during primary angioplasty in AMI. Distal protection,
however, did not improve clinical outcomes.
© 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Myocardial infarction; Angioplasty; Embolization
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.