계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Distal protection device protects microvascular integrity during primary percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Seung-Ho HurKwon-Bae KimBon-Kwon KooSeung-Hwan LeeJunghan YoonSeung-Jea TahkByoung-Joo ChoiSo-Yeon ChoiMyeong-Ho YoonHyeon-Cheol GwonGeu-Ru HongYoung-Jo Kim
Keimyung Author(s)
Hur, Seung HoKim, Kwon Bae
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
International Journal of Cardiology
Issued Date
2008
Volume
123
Issue
2
Abstract
Background: Distal protection during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the subject of recent controversy. The
present study was designed to determine whether the distal embolic protection preserves myocardial microvascular integrity and improves
clinical outcomes in patients with AMI.
Methods: A total of 116 AMI patients presenting within 12 h of onset of symptoms were enrolled at 7 angioplasty centers. They were
randomly assigned to either primary angioplasty with distal protection group (DP; n=60) or angioplasty alone group (Controls; n=56).
Results: After primary angioplasty, achievement of final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 and TIMI Myocardial
Perfusion (TMP) grade 3 were more frequent in the DP group than in the control group [58/60 (96%) vs. 43/56 (81%), p=0.016; and 39/60
(65%) vs. 20/56 (38%), p=0.001, respectively]. After primary angioplasty, the baseline and hyperemic averaged peak velocities were
significantly higher (23.2±11.5 vs. 18.0±6.9 cm/s, p=0.029; and 39.2±16.7 vs. 30.6±10.8 cm/s, p=0.014, respectively) and the baseline
and hyperemic microvascular resistance indices were significantly lower (4.18±2.22 vs. 5.34±2.25 mm Hg cm−1 s, p=0.036; and 2.38±
1.39 vs. 3.11±1.32 mm Hg cm−1 s, p=0.030, respectively) in the DP group. Patients in the DP group showed more favorable phasic
coronary flow pattern in diastolic deceleration time (679±262 vs. 519±289 ms, p=0.035; and 751±246 vs. 616±269 ms, p=0.035,
respectively). Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months occurred with similar frequency in both groups (8.7% vs. 11.1%, p=0.400).
Conclusions: Distal protection device effectively preserves microvascular integrity during primary angioplasty in AMI. Distal protection,
however, did not improve clinical outcomes.
© 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Myocardial infarction; Angioplasty; Embolization
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
허승호
김권배
Publisher
School of Medicine
Citation
Seung-Ho Hur et al. (2008). Distal protection device protects microvascular integrity during primary
percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: A prospective,
randomized, multicenter trial. International Journal of Cardiology, 123(2), 162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.03.124
Type
Article
ISSN
0167-5273
Source
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527307007978?via%3Dihub
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.03.124
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/35969
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.