계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Culprit-Lesion-Only Versus Multivessel Revascularization Using Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-Based Analysis

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Hyun Su JoJong Seon ParkJang Won SohnJoon Cheol YoonChang Woo SohnSang Hee LeeGeu Ru HongDong Gu ShinYoung Jo KimMyung Ho JeongShung Chull ChaeSeung Ho HurTaek Jong HongIn Whan SeongJei Keon ChaeJay Young RhewIn Ho ChaeMyeong Chan ChoJang Ho BaeSeung Woon RhaChong Jin KimDong Hoon ChoiYang Soo JangJung Han YoonWook Sung ChungKi Bae SeungSeung Jung Park
Keimyung Author(s)
Hur, Seung Ho
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Korean Circulation Journal
Issued Date
2011
Volume
41
Issue
12
Keyword
Myocardial infarctionCoronary artery diseaseAngioplasty
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease, complete revascularization (CR) for non-culprit lesions is not routinely recommended. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of multivessel compared with infarct-related artery (IRA)-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. Subjects and Methods: From the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) database, 1,094 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI with drug-eluting stents were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: culprit-vessel-only revascularization (COR, n=827) group; multivessel revascularization, including non-IRA (MVR, n=267) group. The primary endpoint of this study included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), such as death, myocardial infarction, or target or nontarget lesion revascularization at one year. Results: There was no difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups. During the one-year follow-up, 102 (15.2%) patients in the COR group and 32 (14.2%) in the MVR group experienced at least one MACE (p=0.330). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of rates of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization (2.1% vs. 2.0%, 0.7% vs. 0.8%, and 11.7% vs. 10.1%, respectively; p=0.822, 0.910, and 0.301, respectively). The MACE rate was higher in the incompletely revascularized patients than in the completely revascularized patients (15% vs. 9.5%, p=0.039), and the difference was attributable to a higher rate of nontarget vessel revascularization (8.6% vs. 1.8%, p=0.002). Conclusion: Although multivessel angioplasty during primary PCI for STEMI did not reduce the MACE rate compared with culprit-vessel-only PCI, CR was associated with a lower rate of repeat revascularization after multivessel PCI.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
허승호
Publisher
School of Medicine
Citation
Hyun Su Jo et al. (2011). Culprit-Lesion-Only Versus Multivessel Revascularization Using Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-Based Analysis. Korean Circulation Journal, 41(12), 718–725. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.12.718
Type
Article
ISSN
1738-5520
DOI
10.4070/kcj.2011.41.12.718
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/36047
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.