계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

DNA분석에 있어서 모세관 이동법과 진공압 이동법 및 전기 이동법의 비교

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
서민호황미열백성덕백원기서성일박종욱김재룡Min Ho SuhMee Yeol WhangSung Duck PaikWon Ki BaekSeong Il SuhJong Wook ParkJae Ryong Kim
Keimyung Author(s)
Suh, Min HoBaek, Won KiSuh, Seong IlPark, Jong WookKim, Jae Ryong
Department
Dept. of Microbiology (미생물학)
Dept. of Immunology (면역학)
Dept. of Laboratory Medicine (진단검사의학)
Journal Title
대한미생물학회지
Issued Date
1993
Volume
28
Issue
4
Abstract
In order to evaluate the efficiencies of various DNA blotting methods for routine clinical laboratory application of Southern blotting, we compared three blotting methods, i.e. capillary, vacuum, and electric. We used serially diluted concentrations of HindIII-digested lambda DNA for large molecular ranges (23.130-2.027 Kb), and 123 DNA ladder for small molecular ranges (0.123¬4.182 Kb). In capillary blotting, the efficiencies of DNA transfer both in large and small molecular ranges were good, but it took 18 hours to transfer DNA of 23 Kb in size, And the procedures were somewhat labor-intensive. In electric blotting, the efficiency of DNA transfer was good and blotting time was relatively short (2 hours). But the amount of blotting buffer consumption was as many as 5,000 ml and the cost of electric transfer apparatus was high. In vacuum blotting, the efficiencies of DNA transfer both in large and small molecular ranger were good, and blotting time was very short (only 1 hour). The amount of blotting buffer consumption was only 70 ml, and handling was very simple in vacuum blotting procedure.
In conclusion, the vacuum blotting method is very rapid, simple, efficient and economic ; so we think this method is the best choice for routine clinical laboratory application of Southern blotting.
Key Words : Southern blotting, Capillary transfer, Vacuum transfer, Electro-transfer.
Alternative Title
Comparison of Capillary Transfer, Vacuum Transfer and Electro-transfer in DNA Analysis
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
서민호
백원기
서성일
박종욱
김재룡
Publisher
School of Medicine
Citation
서민호 et al. (1993). DNA분석에 있어서 모세관 이동법과 진공압 이동법 및 전기 이동법의 비교. 대한미생물학회지, 28(4), 295–302.
Type
Article
ISSN
0253-3162
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/40147
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Immunology (면역학)
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Laboratory Medicine (진단검사의학)
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Microbiology (미생물학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.