Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement
- Author(s)
- Jonghanne Park; Joo Myung Lee; MD; Bon-Kwon Koo; Eun-Seok Shin; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Doyeon Hwang; Jinlong Zhang; Xinyang Hu; JianAn Wang; Fei Ye; Shaoliang Chen; Junqing Yang; Jiyan Chen; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Hitoshi Matsuo; Hiroaki Takashima; Yasutsugu Shiono; Takashi Akasaka
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Nam, Chang Wook
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- Journal of American Heart Association
- Issued Date
- 2018
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Keyword
- coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; multivessel coronary artery disease; physiology/function; prognosis
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND:
Understanding of the risk conferred by functionally insignificant lesions in multiple coronary vessels is limited. We investigated the prognostic implications of coronary artery disease (CAD) based on 3-vessel fractional flow reserve (FFR).
METHODS AND RESULTS:
A total of 1,136 patients underwent FFR measurement in the 3 major epicardial arteries. We defined vessels with "Moderate CAD" as vessels with FFR, 0.81 to 0.87. Patients were classified into Group 1: No apparent CAD (FFR>0.87 in all 3-vessels); Group 2: Single-vessel moderate CAD; Group 3: Multivessel moderate CAD; and Group 4: Functionally significant CAD (FFR≤0.80) in any vessel. The primary end point was 2-year major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization. Forty-three percent of patients had moderate CAD (Group 2: 403/1136, 35.5%; Group 3: 84/1136, 7.4%). The 2-year risk of major adverse cardiac events was not significantly different between patients with single-vessel moderate CAD and no apparent CAD (2.6 versus 2.6%; HR, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.4%-2.8%; P=0.89). However, patients with multivessel moderate CAD were at significantly higher risk than Group 1 (7.4 versus 2.6%; hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1%-9.8%; P=0.03). The risk of major adverse cardiac events in patients with multivessel moderate CAD was comparable to that of patients with functionally significant CAD (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.5%-3.0%; P=0.67). In a multivariable regression model, multivessel moderate CAD was an independent predictor of greater risk of 2-year major adverse cardiac events.
CONCLUSIONS:
Global physiologic assessment with FFR measurement of 3 vessels can identify multivessel moderate CAD. The prognostic implication of multivessel moderate CAD appears comparable to that of functionally significant CAD.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01621438.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.