계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy with Candesartan and/or Amlodipine for Dose Finding in Essential Hypertension: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Il Suk SohnChong-Jin KimTaehoon AhnHo-Joong YounHui-Kyung JeonSang Hyun IhmEun Joo ChoWoo-Baek ChungShung Chull ChaeWoo-Shik KimChang-Wook NamSeong-Mi ParkJi-Yong ChoiYoung-Kwon KimTaek-Jong HongHae-Young LeeJang-Hyun ChoEun-Seok ShinJung-Han YoonTae-Hyun YangMyung-Ho JeongJun-Hee LeeJoong-Il Park
Keimyung Author(s)
Nam, Chang Wook
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Clinical Therapeutics
Issued Date
2017
Volume
39
Issue
8
Keyword
amlodipinecandesartancombinationhypertension
Abstract
PURPOSE:

Intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering is important for the treatment of hypertension; however, it has been a challenge to achieve target BP in many patients. The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal dosage of a fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil (CAN) and amlodipine besylate (AML), by examining the tolerability and efficacy of CAN/AML combination therapy compared with those of monotherapy with either drug in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS:

This Phase II multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial enrolled patients aged 19 years or older with essential hypertension, defined as a mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) between 95 and 115 mm Hg, and a mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) of <200 mm Hg after a 2-week placebo run-in period. A total of 635 patients were screened, of whom 439 were randomized to receive treatment; 425 patients were included in the full analysis set (combination therapy, 212; monotherapy, 213). Participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 8 treatments: CAN (8 or 16 mg), AML (5 or 10 mg), CAN/AML (8 mg/5 mg, 8 mg/10 mg, 16 mg/5 mg, or 16 mg/10 mg), once daily for 8 weeks.

FINDINGS:

After 8 weeks of treatment, changes in msDBP were significantly greater in the groups receiving CAN/AML combination therapies compared with monotherapies at matched doses, with the exception of CAN 8 mg/AML 10 mg versus AML 10 mg. The response to treatment and the achievement of target BP (both msSBP and msDBP) at week 8 were significantly greater overall in the groups that received combination therapy versus monotherapy. All medications were relatively well tolerated in each group.

IMPLICATIONS:

Eight-week administration of CAN/AML (8 mg/5 mg, 16 mg/5 mg, and 16 mg/10 mg) resulted in a significantly greater BP reduction than that with CAN or AML monotherapy, and was determined to be well tolerated.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
남창욱
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Citation
Il Suk Sohn et al. (2017). Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy with Candesartan and/or Amlodipine for Dose Finding in Essential Hypertension: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. Clinical Therapeutics, 39(8), 1628–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.014
Type
Article
ISSN
0149-2918
Source
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0149-2918(17)30767-1
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.014
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/41226
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.