Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy
- Author(s)
- Hitoshi Matsuo; Martijin Meuwissen; Giampaolo Niccoli; Jan J. Piek; Flavo Ribichini; Habib Samady; James Sapontis; Arnold H. Seto; Murat Sezer; Andrew S.P. Sharp; Jasvindar Singh; Hiroaki Takashima; Sam J. Lehman; Suneel Talwar; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kare Tang; Eric Van Belle; Niels van Royen; Hugo Vinhas; Christiaan J. Vrints; Darren Walters; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Bruce Samuels; Christopher Buller; Patrick W. Serruys; Javier Escaned; Justin E. Davies; Manesh R. Patel; Chee Hae Kim; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Joo Myung Lee; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Christopher M. Cook; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Iqbal S. Malik; Sukhjinder S. Nijjer; Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Eduardo Alegria-Barrero; Ali Alghamdi; John Altman; Sérgio B. Baptista; Ravinay Bhindi; Waldemar Bojara; Salvatore Brugaletta; Pedro Canas Silva; Carlo Di Mario; Andrejs Erglis; Robert T. Gerber; Olaf Going; Tobias Härle; Farrel Hellig; Ciro Indolfi; Luc Janssens; Allen Jeremias; Rajesh K. Kharbanda; Ahmed Khashaba; Yuetsu Kikuta; Florian Krackhardt; Mika Laine
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Nam, Chang Wook
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
- Issued Date
- 2019
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 20
- Keyword
- linical outcome; instantaneous wave-free ratio; sex; fractional flow reserve
- Abstract
- Objectives:
This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)– and fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided revascularization strategies.
Background:
An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes.
Methods:
This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization.
Results:
Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 ± 0.51 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 ± 0.09 vs. 0.91 ± 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919).
Conclusions:
An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038)
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.