Clinicopathological characteristics of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a Japan-Korea collaborative study
- Author(s)
- Keiichi Kubota; Jin‐Young Jang; Yasuni Nakanuma; Kee‐Taek Jang; Yasuo Haruyama; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Toru Furukawa; Seung‐Mo Hong; Yuhki Sakuraoka; Haeryoung Kim; Takatsugu Matsumoto; Kyung Bun Lee; Yoh Zen; Jaeri Kim; Masaru Miyazaki; Dong Wook Choi; Jin Seok Heo; Itaru Endo; Shin Hwang; Masafumi Nakamura; Ho‐Seong Han; Shinji Uemoto; Sang Jae Park; Eun Kyung Hong; Atsushi Nanashima; Dong‐Sik Kim; Joo Young Kim; Tetsuo Ohta; Koo Jeong Kang; Takumi Fukumoto; Yang Won Nah; Hyung Il Seo; Kazuo Inui; Dong‐Sup Yoon; Michiaki Unno
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Kang, Koo Jeong
- Department
- Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
- Journal Title
- Journal of hepatobiliary pancreatic sciences
- Issued Date
- 2020
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Keyword
- biliary tract neoplasm; cholangiocarcinoma; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas; intraepithelial neoplasm; preinvasive carcinoma
- Abstract
- Background:
The prevalent location and incidence of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) and invasive carcinoma associated with them have varied markedly among studies due to differences in diagnostic criteria and tumor location.
Methods:
IPNBs were classified into two types: Type 1 IPNB, being histologically similar to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, and Type 2 IPNB, having a more complex histological architecture with irregular papillary branching or foci of solid-tubular components. Medical data were evaluated.
Results:
Among 694 IPNB patients, 520 and 174 had Type 1 and Type 2, respectively. The levels of AST, ALT, ALP, T. Bil, and CEA were significantly higher in patients with Type 2 than in those with Type 1. Type 1 IPNB was more frequently located in the intrahepatic bile duct than Type 2, whereas Type 2 was more frequently located in the distal bile duct than Type 1 IPNB (P < 0.001). There were significant differences in 5-year cumulative survival rates (75.2% vs 50.9%; P < 0.0001) and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates (64.1% vs 35.3%; P < 0.0001) between the two groups.
Conclusion:
Type 1 and Type 2 IPNBs differ in their clinicopathological features and prognosis. This classification may help to further understand IPNB.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.