계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after coronary stenting according to type of P2Y12 inhibitor

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Juwon KimWoo Jin JangWang Soo LeeKi Hong ChoiJoo Myung LeeTaek Kyu ParkJeong Hoon YangJin-Ho ChoiYoung Bin SongSeung-Hyuk ChoiHyeon-Cheol GwonSang Hoon LeeJu-Hyeon OhWoo Jung ChunYong Hwan ParkEul-Soon ImJin-Ok JeongByung Ryul ChoSeok Kyu OhKyeong Ho YunDeok-Kyu ChoJong-Young LeeYoung-Youp KohJang-Whan BaeJae Woong ChoiHyuck Jun YoonSeung Uk LeeJang Hyun ChoWoong Gil ChoiSeung-Woon RhaJoo-Yong Hahn
Keimyung Author(s)
Yoon, Hyuck Jun
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Heart
Issued Date
2021
Volume
107
Issue
13
Abstract
Objective:
To compare P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with 12-month DAPT according to the type of P2Y12 inhibitor in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods:
The Smart Angioplasty Research Team: Comparison Between P2Y12 Antagonist Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents (SMART-CHOICE) randomised trial compared 3-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with 12-month DAPT. In this trial, 2993 patients undergoing successful PCI with drug-eluting stent were enrolled in Korea. As a prespecified analysis, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT versus 12-month DAPT were compared among patients receiving clopidogrel and those receiving potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel), respectively. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or stroke at 12 months after the index procedure.

Results:
Among 2993 patients (mean age 64 years), 58.2% presented with acute coronary syndrome. Clopidogrel was prescribed in 2312 patients (77.2%) and a potent P2Y12 inhibitor in 681 (22.8%). There were no significant differences in the primary endpoint between the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy group and the DAPT group among patients receiving clopidogrel (3.0% vs 3.0%; HR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.65; p=0.93) as well as among patients receiving potent P2Y12 inhibitors (2.4% vs 0.7%; HR: 3.37; 95% CI 0.77 to 14.78; p=0.11; interaction p=0.1). Among patients receiving clopidogrel, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with DAPT showed consistent treatment effects across various subgroups for the primary endpoint. Among patients receiving potent P2Y12 inhibitors, the rate of bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2– 5) was significantly lower in the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy group than in the DAPT group (1.5% vs 5.0%; HR: 0.33; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.87; p=0.03).

Conclusions:
Compared with 12-month DAPT, clopidogrel monotherapy after 3-month DAPT showed comparable cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
윤혁준
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Citation
Juwon Kim et al. (2021). P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after coronary stenting according to type of P2Y12 inhibitor. Heart, 107(13), 1077–1083. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318821
Type
Article
ISSN
1468-201X
Source
https://heart.bmj.com/content/107/13/1077
DOI
10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318821
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/43742
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.