Oncologic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: An international retrospective cohort study
- Author(s)
- Yudai Fukui; Koya Hida; Nobuaki Hoshino; Seung Ho Song; Soo Yeun Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Yusuke Maeda; Shuichiro Matoba; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Sung Uk Bae; Woon Kyung Jeong; Seong Kyu Baek; Yoshiharu Sakai
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Bae, Sung Uk; Jeong, Woon Kyung; Baek, Seong Kyu
- Department
- Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
- Journal Title
- Eur J Surg Oncol
- Issued Date
- 2022
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Keyword
- Rectal cancer; Chemoradiotherapy; Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection; Adjuvant chemotherapy
- Abstract
- Introduction:
Intensive local treatment comprising total mesorectal excision (TME) with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has received attention among clinicians treating rectal cancer. It remains unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after intensive local treatment is beneficial for these patients. We evaluated the oncologic benefit of ACT for patients with LARC who received intensive local treatment.
Materials and methods:
This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included 737 patients treated in Japan and Korea between 2010 and 2017. The effectiveness of ACT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analyses to identify subpopulations potentially benefiting from ACT.
Results:
The median follow-up was 49 months; the 5-year RFS and local recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 72.1% and 4.9%, respectively; 514 patients (69.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, without an oncologic benefit (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79–1.68) demonstrated in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. In subgroup analyses, the distributions of the 95% CI in patients aged ≥70 years and those with ypStage 0 tended to place a disproportionate emphasis that favoured the non-ACT treatment strategy.
Conclusion:
Despite achieving good local control with intensive local treatment strategy, the effectiveness of ACT for the LARC patients with CRT followed by TME with selective LPND was not proved. Elderly patients and those with ypStage0 may not receive benefit from ACT after CRT and TME ± LPND.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.