계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel for Long-Term Maintenance Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The HOST-EXAM Extended Study

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Jeehoon KangKyung Woo ParkHuijin LeeDoyeon HwangHan-Mo YangSeung-Woon RhaJang-Whan BaeNam Ho LeeSeung-Ho HurJung-Kyu HanEun-Seok ShinBon-Kwon KooHyo-Soo Kim
Keimyung Author(s)
Hur, Seung Ho
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Circulation
Issued Date
2023
Volume
147
Issue
2
Keyword
percutaneous coronary interventionplatelet aggregation inhibitorstreatment outcome
Abstract
Background:
Long-term outcomes of antiplatelet monotherapy in patients who receive percutaneous coronary intervention are unknown. The HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Extended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) Extended study reports the posttrial follow-up results of the original HOST-EXAM trial.

Methods:
From March 2014 through May 2018, 5438 patients who maintained dual antiplatelet therapy without clinical events for 12±6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary end point (a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission attributable to acute coronary syndrome, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or greater bleeding), secondary thrombotic end point (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, readmission attributable to acute coronary syndrome, and definite or probable stent thrombosis), and bleeding end point (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or greater bleeding) were analyzed during the extended follow-up period. Analysis was performed on the per-protocol population (2431 patients in the clopidogrel group and 2286 patients in the aspirin group).

Results:
During a median follow-up of 5.8 years (interquartile range, 4.8-6.2 years), the primary end point occurred in 12.8% and 16.9% in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63-0.86]; P<0.001). The clopidogrel group had a lower risk for the secondary thrombotic end point (7.9% versus 11.9%; hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.55-0.79]; P<0.001) and secondary bleeding end point (4.5% versus 6.1%; hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.94]; P=0.016). There was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death between the 2 groups (6.2% versus 6.0%; hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.82-1.31]; P=0.742). Landmark analysis at 2 years showed that the beneficial effect of clopidogrel was consistent throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusions:
During an extended follow-up of >5 years after randomization, clopidogrel monotherapy compared with aspirin monotherapy was associated with lower rates of the composite net clinical outcome in patients without clinical events for 12±6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.

Registration:
URL: https://www.

Clinicaltrials:
gov; Unique identifier: NCT02044250.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
허승호
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1524-4539
Source
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062770
DOI
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062770
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/44748
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.