Bifurcation strategies using second-generation drug-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in diabetic patients
- Author(s)
- Jung-Joon Cha; Soon Jun Hong; Ju Hyeon Kim; Subin Lim; Hyung Joon Joo; Jae Hyoung Park; Cheol Woong Yu; Jeehoon Kang; Hyo-Soo Kim; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Woo Jung Chun; Seung-Ho Hur; Seung Hwan Han; Seung-Woon Rha; In-Ho Chae; Jin-Ok Jeong; Jung Ho Heo; Junghan Yoon; Jong-Seon Park; Myeong-Ki Hong; Joon-Hyung Doh; Kwang Soo Cha; Doo-Il Kim; Sang Yeub Lee; Kiyuk Chang; Byung-Hee Hwang; So-Yeon Choi; Myung Ho Jeong; Young Bin Song; Ki Hong Choi; Chang-Wook Nam; Bon-Kwon Koo; Do-Sun Lim
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Hur, Seung Ho; Nam, Chang Wook
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- Front Cardiovasc Med
- Issued Date
- 2022
- Volume
- 9
- Keyword
- clinical outcome; coronary bifurcation angioplasty; diabetes mellitus; percutaneous coronary intervention (complex PCI); second-generation drug-eluting stent; stent strategy
- Abstract
- Background:
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a critical risk factor for the pathogenesis and progression of coronary artery disease, with a higher prevalence of complex coronary artery disease, including bifurcation lesions. This study aimed to elucidate the optimal stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions in patients with DM.
Methods:
A total of 905 patients with DM and bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) from a multicenter retrospective patient cohort were analyzed. The primary outcome was the 5-year incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
Results:
Among all patients with DM with significant bifurcation lesions, 729 (80.6%) and 176 (19.4%) were treated with one- and two-stent strategies, respectively. TLF incidence differed according to the stenting strategy during the mean follow-up of 42 ± 20 months. Among the stent strategies, T- and V-stents were associated with a higher TLF incidence than one-stent strategy (24.0 vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001), whereas no difference was observed in TLF between the one-stent strategy and crush or culotte technique (7.3 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.645). The T- or V-stent technique was an independent predictor of TLF in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 3.592; 95% confidence interval, 2.117-6.095; p < 0.001). Chronic kidney disease, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and left main bifurcation were independent predictors of TLF in patients with DM.
Conclusion:
T- or V-stenting in patients with DM resulted in increased cardiovascular events after second-generation DES implantation.
Clinical trial registration:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03068494?term=03068494&draw=2&rank=1, identifier: NCT03068494.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.