Novel Benchmark Values for Open Major Anatomic Liver Resection in Non-cirrhotic Patients: A Multicentric Study of 44 International Expert Centers
- Author(s)
- Richard X Sousa Da Silva; Eva Breuer; Sadhana Shankar; Shoji Kawakatsu; Wacław Hołówko; João Santos Coelho; Heithem Jeddou; Teiichi Sugiura; Mohammed Ghallab; Doris Da Silva; Genki Watanabe; Florin Botea; Nozomu Sakai; Pietro Addeo; Stylianos Tzedakis; Fabian Bartsch; Kaja Balcer; Chetana Lim; Fabien Werey; Victor Lopez-Lopez; Luciana Peralta Montero; Rodrigo Sanchez Claria; Jennifer Leiting; Neeta Vachharajani; Eve Hopping; Orlando J M Torres; Satoshi Hirano; Daan Andel; Jeroen Hagendoorn; Alicja Psica; Matteo Ravaioli; Keun Soon Ahn; Tim Reese; Leonardo A Montes; Ganesh Gunasekaran; Cándido Alcázar; Jin Hong Lim; Muhammad Haroon; Qian Lu; Antonio Castaldi; Tatsuya Orimo; Beat Moeckli; Teresa Abadía; Luis Ruffolo; Josefina Dib Hasan; Francesca Ratti; Emmanuele F Kauffmann; Roeland F de Wilde; Wojciech G Polak; Ugo Boggi; Luca Aldrighetti; Lucas McCormack; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Alejandro Serrablo; Christian Toso; Akinobu Taketomi; Jean Gugenheim; Jiahong Dong; Faisal Hanif; Joon Seong Park; José M Ramia; Myron Schwartz; Diego Ramisch; Michelle L De Oliveira; Karl J Oldhafer; Koo Jeong Kang; Matteo Cescon; Peter Lodge; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Takehiro Noji; John-Edwin Thomson; Su Kah Goh; William C Chapman; Sean P Cleary; Juan Pekolj; Jean-Marc Regimbeau; Olivier Scatton; Stéphanie Truant; Hauke Lang; David Fuks; Philippe Bachellier; Masayuki Ohtsuka; Irinel Popescu; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Mickaël Lesurtel; René Adam; Daniel Cherqui; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Karim Boudjema; Hugo Pinto-Marques; Michał Grąt; Henrik Petrowsky; Tomoki Ebata; Andreas Prachalias; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Kang, Koo Jeong
- Department
- Dept. of Surgery (외과학)
- Journal Title
- Ann Surg
- Issued Date
- 2023
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 5
- Abstract
- Objective:
This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities.
Background:
Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures.
Methods:
A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient.
Results:
Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months.
Conclusion:
These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.