Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial
- Author(s)
- Do-Yoon Kang; Jung-Min Ahn; Sung-Cheol Yun; Seung-Ho Hur; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Cheol Hyun Lee; Soon Jun Hong; Subin Lim; Sang-Wook Kim; Hoyoun Won; Jun-Hyok Oh; Jeong Cheon Choe; Young Joon Hong; Yong-Hoon Yoon; Hoyun Kim; Yeonwoo Choi; Jinho Lee; Young Won Yoon; Soo-Joong Kim; Jang-Ho Bae; Duk-Woo Park; Seung-Jung Park
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Hur, Seung Ho
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- Circulation
- Issued Date
- 2023
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 16
- Keyword
- cardiac imaging techniques; percutaneous coronary intervention; tomography, optical coherence; ultrasonography, interventional
- Abstract
- Background:
Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the comparative effectiveness of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI regarding clinical outcomes is unknown.
Methods:
In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic trial, we randomly assigned 2008 patients with significant coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either an OCT-guided or IVUS-guided PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year, which was powered for noninferiority of the OCT group compared with the IVUS group. Safety outcomes were also assessed.
Results:
At 1 year, primary end point events occurred in 25 of 1005 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 2.5%) in the OCT group and in 31 of 1003 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 3.1%) in the IVUS group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points; upper boundary of one-sided 97.5% CI, 0.97 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar (14 patients [1.4%] in the OCT group versus 15 patients [1.5%] in the IVUS group; P=0.85). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT group than in the IVUS group (22 [2.2%] versus 37 [3.7%]; P=0.047), although imaging procedure-related complications were not observed.
Conclusions:
In patients with significant coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI was noninferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. The selected study population and lower-than-expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial.
Registration:
URL: https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique number: NCT03394079
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.