계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Do-Yoon KangJung-Min AhnSung-Cheol YunSeung-Ho HurYun-Kyeong ChoCheol Hyun LeeSoon Jun HongSubin LimSang-Wook KimHoyoun WonJun-Hyok OhJeong Cheon ChoeYoung Joon HongYong-Hoon YoonHoyun KimYeonwoo ChoiJinho LeeYoung Won YoonSoo-Joong KimJang-Ho BaeDuk-Woo ParkSeung-Jung Park
Keimyung Author(s)
Hur, Seung Ho
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Circulation
Issued Date
2023
Volume
148
Issue
16
Keyword
cardiac imaging techniquespercutaneous coronary interventiontomography, optical coherenceultrasonography, interventional
Abstract
Background:
Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the comparative effectiveness of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI regarding clinical outcomes is unknown.

Methods:
In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic trial, we randomly assigned 2008 patients with significant coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either an OCT-guided or IVUS-guided PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year, which was powered for noninferiority of the OCT group compared with the IVUS group. Safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results:
At 1 year, primary end point events occurred in 25 of 1005 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 2.5%) in the OCT group and in 31 of 1003 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 3.1%) in the IVUS group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points; upper boundary of one-sided 97.5% CI, 0.97 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar (14 patients [1.4%] in the OCT group versus 15 patients [1.5%] in the IVUS group; P=0.85). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT group than in the IVUS group (22 [2.2%] versus 37 [3.7%]; P=0.047), although imaging procedure-related complications were not observed.

Conclusions:
In patients with significant coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI was noninferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. The selected study population and lower-than-expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial.

Registration:
URL: https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique number: NCT03394079
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
허승호
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1524-4539
Source
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066429
DOI
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066429
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45190
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.