계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Microvascular resistance reserve: diagnostic and prognostic performance in the ILIAS registry

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Coen K M BoerhoutJoo Myung LeeGuus A de WaardHernan Mejia-RenteriaSeung Hun LeeJi-Hyun JungMasahiro HoshinoMauro Echavarria-PintoMartijn MeuwissenHitoshi MatsuoMaribel Madera-CamberoAshkan EftekhariMohamed A EffatTadashi MuraiKoen MarquesJoon-Hyung DohEvald H ChristiansenRupak BanerjeeChang-Wook Nam 16, Giampaolo NiccoliMasafumi NakayamaNobuhiro TanakaEun-Seok ShinYolande AppelmanMarcel A M BeijkNiels van RoyenPaul KnaapenJavier EscanedTsunekazu KakutaBon Kwon KooJan J PiekTim P van de Hoef
Keimyung Author(s)
Nam, Chang Wook
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Eur Heart J
Issued Date
2023
Volume
44
Issue
30
Keyword
Coroanry artery diseaseCoronary microvascular dysfunctionCoronary physiologyMicrovascular resistance reserve
Abstract
Aims:
The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was introduced as a means to characterize the vasodilator reserve capacity of the coronary microcirculation while accounting for the influence of concomitant epicardial disease and the impact of administration of potent vasodilators on aortic pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of MRR.

Methods and results:
A total of 1481 patients with stable symptoms and a clinical indication for coronary angiography were included from the global ILIAS Registry. MRR was derived as a function of the coronary flow reserve (CFR) divided by the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and corrected for driving pressure. The median MRR was 2.97 [Q1-Q3: 2.32-3.86] and the overall relationship between MRR and CFR was good [correlation coefficient (Rs) = 0.88, P < 0.005]. The difference between CFR and MRR increased with decreasing FFR [coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.34; Coef.-2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.05--2.73; P < 0.005]. MRR was independently associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 5-year follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.95; P = 0.024] and with target vessel failure (TVF) at 5-year follow-up (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76-0.97; P = 0.047). The optimal cut-off value of MRR was 3.0. Based on this cut-off value, only abnormal MRR was significantly associated with MACE and TVF at 5-year follow-up in vessels with functionally significant epicardial disease (FFR <0.75).

Conclusion:
MRR seems a robust indicator of the microvascular vasodilator reserve capacity. Moreover, in line with its theoretical background, this study suggests a diagnostic advantage of MRR over other indices of vasodilatory capacity in patients with hemodynamically significant epicardial coronary artery disease.

Trial registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0448523.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
남창욱
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1522-9645
Source
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/30/2862/7205678?login=true
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehad378
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45206
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.