계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Comparison of Antiplatelet Monotherapies After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Clinical, Ischemic, and Bleeding Risks

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Seokhun YangJeehoon KangKyung Woo ParkSeung-Ho HurNam Ho LeeDoyeon HwangHan-Mo YangHyo-Suk AhnKwang Soo ChaSang-Ho JoJae Kean RyuIl-Woo SuhHyun-Hee ChoiSeong-Ill WooJung-Kyu HanEun-Seok ShinBon-Kwon KooHyo-Soo Kim
Keimyung Author(s)
Hur, Seung Ho
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
J Am Coll Cardiol
Issued Date
2023
Volume
82
Issue
16
Keyword
aspirinbleedingclopidogrelischemic eventspercutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
Background:
Clopidogrel was superior to aspirin monotherapy in secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of clopidogrel across high-risk subgroups METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases-EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial that randomly assigned patients who were event free for 6 to 18 months post-PCI on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy. Two clinical risk scores were used for risk stratification: the DAPT score and the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) (the sum of age ≥75 years, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, peripheral artery disease, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, and renal dysfunction). The primary composite endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission because of acute coronary syndrome, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥3) at 2 years after randomization.

Results:
Among 5,403 patients, clopidogrel monotherapy showed a lower rate of the primary composite endpoint than aspirin monotherapy (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90). The benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin was consistent regardless of TRS 2°P (high TRS 2°P [≥3] group: HR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.44-0.96]; and low TRS 2°P [<3] group: HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.60-0.99]) (P for interaction = 0.454) and regardless of DAPT score (high DAPT score [≥2] group: HR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.46-1.00]; and low DAPT score [<2] group: HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59-0.96]) (P for interaction = 0.662). The association was similar for the individual outcomes.

Conclusions:
The beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin monotherapy was consistent regardless of clinical risk or relative ischemic and bleeding risks compared with aspirin monotherapy. (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis- EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy [HOST-EXAM]; NCT02044250).
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
허승호
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1558-3597
Source
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073510972306463X
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2023.07.031
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45495
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.