Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography orIntravascular Ultrasound
- Author(s)
- Do-Yoon Kang; Jung-Min Ahn; Sung-Cheol Yun; Seung-Ho Hur; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Cheol Hyun Lee; Soon Jun Hong; Subin Lim; Sang-Wook Kim; Hoyoun Won; Jun-Hyok Oh; Jeong Cheon Choe; Young Joon Hong; Yong-Hoon Yoon; Hoyun Kim; Yeonwoo Choi; Jinho Lee; Young Won Yoon; Soo-Joong Kim; Jang-Ho Bae; Seung-Jung Park; Duk-Woo Park
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Hur, Seung Ho; Cho, Yun Kyeong; Lee, Cheol Hyun
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- J Am Coll Cardiol
- Issued Date
- 2024
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Keyword
- intracoronary imaging; intravascular ultrasound; optical coherent tomography; percutaneous coronary intervention
- Abstract
- Background:
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear.
Objectives:
This study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions.
Methods:
This was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.
Results:
In 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03).
Conclusions:
Among patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079).
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.