계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography orIntravascular Ultrasound

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Do-Yoon KangJung-Min AhnSung-Cheol YunSeung-Ho HurYun-Kyeong ChoCheol Hyun LeeSoon Jun HongSubin LimSang-Wook KimHoyoun WonJun-Hyok OhJeong Cheon ChoeYoung Joon HongYong-Hoon YoonHoyun KimYeonwoo ChoiJinho LeeYoung Won YoonSoo-Joong KimJang-Ho BaeSeung-Jung ParkDuk-Woo Park
Keimyung Author(s)
Hur, Seung HoCho, Yun KyeongLee, Cheol Hyun
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
J Am Coll Cardiol
Issued Date
2024
Volume
83
Issue
3
Keyword
intracoronary imagingintravascular ultrasoundoptical coherent tomographypercutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
Background:
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear.

Objectives:
This study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions.

Methods:
This was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

Results:
In 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03).

Conclusions:
Among patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079).
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
허승호
조윤경
이철현
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1558-3597
Source
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109723078166
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45496
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.