계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Differential Impact of FractionalFlowReserve Measured AfterCoronary Stent Implantation by Left VentricularDysfunction

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Ki Hong ChoiWoochan KwonDoosup ShinSeung-Hun LeeDoyeon HwangJinlong ZhangChang-Wook NamEun-Seok ShinJoon-Hyung DohShao-Liang ChenTsunekazu KakutaGabor G TothZsolt PirothAbdul HakeemBarry F UretskyYohei HokamaNobuhiro TanakaHong-Seok LimTsuyoshi ItoAkiko MatsuoLorenzo AzzaliniMassoud A LeesarJoost DaemenDamien CollisonCarlos ColletBernard De BruyneBon-Kwon KooTaek Kyu ParkJeong Hoon YangYoung Bin SongJoo-Yong HahnSeung-Hyuk ChoiHyeon-Cheol GwonJoo Myung Lee
Keimyung Author(s)
Nam, Chang Wook
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
JACC Asia
Issued Date
2023
Volume
4
Issue
3
Keyword
drug-eluting stent(s)fractional flow reserveleft ventricular ejection fractionpercutaneous coronary interventionprognosis
Abstract
Background:
Both left ventricular systolic function and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are prognostic factors after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, how these prognostic factors are inter-related in risk stratification of patients after PCI remains unclarified.

Objectives:
This study evaluated differential prognostic implication of post-PCI FFR according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods:
A total of 2,965 patients with available LVEF were selected from the POST-PCI FLOW (Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization with Stent) international registry of patients with post-PCI FFR measurement. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) at 2 years. The secondary outcome was target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and target vessel failure, which was a composite of cardiac death, TVMI, or TVR.

Results:
Post-PCI FFR was independently associated with the risk of target vessel failure (per 0.01 decrease: HRadj: 1.029; 95% CI: 1.009-1.049; P = 0.005). Post-PCI FFR was associated with increased risk of cardiac death or TVMI (HRadj: 1.145; 95% CI: 1.025-1.280; P = 0.017) among patients with LVEF ≤40%, and with that of TVR in patients with LVEF >40% (HRadj: 1.028; 95% CI: 1.005-1.052; P = 0.020). Post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 was associated with increased risk of cardiac death or TVMI in the LVEF ≤40% group and with that of TVR in LVEF >40% group. Prognostic impact of post-PCI FFR for the primary outcome was significantly different according to LVEF (Pinteraction = 0.019).

Conclusions:
Post-PCI FFR had differential prognostic impact according to LVEF. Residual ischemia by post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 was a prognostic indicator for cardiac death or TVMI among patients with patients with LVEF ≤40%, and it was associated with TVR among patients with patients with LVEF>40%. (Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization with Stent [POST-PCI FLOW]; NCT04684043).
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
남창욱
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
2772-3747
Source
https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.10.009
DOI
10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.10.009
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45523
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.