Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Before and After Standardized Optimization Protocols
- Author(s)
- Woochan Kwon; David Hong; Ki Hong Choi; Seung Hun Lee; Doosup Shin; Jong-Young Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Sang Yeub Lee; Sang Min Kim; Kyeong Ho Yun; Jae Young Cho; Chan Joon Kim; Hyo-Suk Ahn; Chang-Wook Nam; Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Yong Hwan Park; Wang Soo Lee; Taek Kyu Park; Jeong Hoon Yang; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Joo Myung Lee
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Nam, Chang Wook; Yoon, Hyuck Jun
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- JACC Cardiovasc Interv
- Issued Date
- 2024
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Keyword
- clinical outcomes; coronary artery disease; intravascular imaging; percutaneous coronary intervention
- Abstract
- Background:
Although benefits of intravascular imaging (IVI) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been observed in previous studies, it is not known whether changes in contemporary practice, especially with application of standardized optimization protocols, have improved clinical outcomes.
Objectives:
The authors sought to investigate whether clinical outcomes of IVI-guided PCI are different before and after the application of standardized optimization protocols in using IVI.
Methods:
2,972 patients from an institutional registry (2008-2015, before application of standardized optimization protocols, the past group) and 1,639 patients from a recently published trial (2018-2021 after application of standardized optimization protocols, the present group) were divided into 2 groups according to use of IVI. The primary outcome was 3-year target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
Results:
Significant reduction of TVF was observed in the IVI-guided PCI group compared with the angiography-guided PCI group (10.0% vs 6.7%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; P = 0.027), mainly driven by reduced cardiac death or myocardial infarction in both past and present IVI-guided PCI groups. When comparing past IVI and present IVI groups, TVF was significantly lower in the present IVI group (8.5% vs 5.1%; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.42-0.94; P = 0.025), with the difference being driven by reduced target vessel revascularization in the present IVI group. Consistent results were observed in inverse-probability-weighting adjusted analysis.
Conclusions:
IVI-guided PCI improved clinical outcomes more than angiography-guided PCI. In addition, application of standardized optimization protocols when using IVI further improved clinical outcomes after PCI. (Intravascular Imaging- Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Complex Coronary Artery Disease [RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI]; NCT03381872; and the institutional cardiovascular catheterization database of Samsung Medical Center: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patient Undergoing CABG or PCI; NCT03870815).
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.