계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Before and After Standardized Optimization Protocols

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Woochan KwonDavid HongKi Hong ChoiSeung Hun LeeDoosup ShinJong-Young LeeSeung-Jae LeeSang Yeub LeeSang Min KimKyeong Ho YunJae Young ChoChan Joon KimHyo-Suk AhnChang-Wook NamHyuck-Jun YoonYong Hwan ParkWang Soo LeeTaek Kyu ParkJeong Hoon YangSeung-Hyuk ChoiHyeon-Cheol GwonYoung Bin SongJoo-Yong HahnJoo Myung Lee
Keimyung Author(s)
Nam, Chang WookYoon, Hyuck Jun
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Issued Date
2024
Volume
17
Issue
2
Keyword
clinical outcomescoronary artery diseaseintravascular imagingpercutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
Background:
Although benefits of intravascular imaging (IVI) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been observed in previous studies, it is not known whether changes in contemporary practice, especially with application of standardized optimization protocols, have improved clinical outcomes.

Objectives:
The authors sought to investigate whether clinical outcomes of IVI-guided PCI are different before and after the application of standardized optimization protocols in using IVI.

Methods:
2,972 patients from an institutional registry (2008-2015, before application of standardized optimization protocols, the past group) and 1,639 patients from a recently published trial (2018-2021 after application of standardized optimization protocols, the present group) were divided into 2 groups according to use of IVI. The primary outcome was 3-year target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.

Results:
Significant reduction of TVF was observed in the IVI-guided PCI group compared with the angiography-guided PCI group (10.0% vs 6.7%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; P = 0.027), mainly driven by reduced cardiac death or myocardial infarction in both past and present IVI-guided PCI groups. When comparing past IVI and present IVI groups, TVF was significantly lower in the present IVI group (8.5% vs 5.1%; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.42-0.94; P = 0.025), with the difference being driven by reduced target vessel revascularization in the present IVI group. Consistent results were observed in inverse-probability-weighting adjusted analysis.

Conclusions:
IVI-guided PCI improved clinical outcomes more than angiography-guided PCI. In addition, application of standardized optimization protocols when using IVI further improved clinical outcomes after PCI. (Intravascular Imaging- Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Complex Coronary Artery Disease [RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI]; NCT03381872; and the institutional cardiovascular catheterization database of Samsung Medical Center: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patient Undergoing CABG or PCI; NCT03870815).
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
남창욱
윤혁준
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1876-7605
Source
https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.062
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.062
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45528
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.