Surveillance Stress Testing After Percutaneous Intervention for PatientsWith Multivessel or LeftMainCoronary Disease
    
    
    
- Author(s)
 
- Joong Min Lee; Hoyun Kim; Young-Sun Park; Ha Hye Jo; So-Min Lim; Jinho Lee; Yeonwoo Choi; Do-Yoon Kang; Jung-Min Ahn; Seonok Kim; Yong-Hoon Yoon; Seung-Ho Hur; Cheol Hyun Lee; Won-Jang Kim; Se Hun Kang; Chul Soo Park; Bong-Ki Lee; Jung-Won Suh; Jae Woong Choi; Kee-Sik Kim; Su Nam Lee; Seung-Jung Park; Duk-Woo Park
 
- Keimyung Author(s)
 
- Hur, Seung Ho; Lee, Cheol Hyun
 
- Department
 
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
 
- Journal Title
 
- J Am Coll Cardiol
 
- Issued Date
 
- 2024
 
- Volume
 
- 83
 
- Issue
 
- 9
 
- Keyword
 
- coronary artery diseasepercutaneous coronary interventionprognosisstress testing
 
- Abstract
 
- Background: 
The optimal surveillance strategy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for high-risk patients with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease (CAD) remains uncertain.
  
Objectives: 
This study aims to determine the prognostic role of routine functional testing in patients with multivessel or left main CAD who underwent PCI.
  
Methods: 
The POST-PCI (Pragmatic Trial Comparing Symptom-Oriented Versus Routine Stress Testing in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial randomized high-risk PCI patients to routine functional testing at 1 year or standard care alone during follow-up. This analysis focused on participants with multivessel or left main CAD. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years.
  
Results: 
Among 1,706 initially randomized patients, 1,192 patients with multivessel (n = 833) or left main (n = 359) were identified, with 589 in the functional testing group and 603 in the standard care group. Two-year incidences of primary outcome were similar between the functional testing group and the standard care group (6.2% vs 5.7%, respectively; HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.68-1.74; P = 0.73). This trend persisted in both groups of multivessel (6.2% vs 5.7%; HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62-1.89; P = 0.78) and left main disease (6.2% vs 5.7%; HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.46-2.56; P = 0.85) (P for interaction = 0.90). Routine surveillance functional testing was associated with increased rates of invasive angiography and repeat revascularization beyond 1 year.
  
Conclusions: 
In high-risk patients with multivessel or left main CAD who underwent PCI, there was no incremental clinical benefit from routine surveillance functional-testing compared with standard care alone during follow-up. (Pragmatic Trial Comparing Symptom-Oriented Versus Routine Stress Testing in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [POST-PCI]; NCT03217877)
 
 
- 공개 및 라이선스
 
- 
 
- 파일 목록
 
- 
 
 
        
        
        
        Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.