계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Woochan KwonKi Hong ChoiSeung Hun LeeDavid HongDoosup ShinHyun Kuk KimKeun Ho ParkEun Ho ChooChan Joon KimMin Chul KimYoung Joon HongSung Gyun AhnJoon-Hyung DohSang Yeub LeeSang Don ParkHyun-Jong LeeMin Gyu KangJin-Sin KohYun-Kyeong ChoChang-Wook NamHyun Sung JohTaek Kyu ParkJeong Hoon YangYoung Bin SongSeung-Hyuk ChoiMyung Ho JeongHyeon-Cheol GwonJoo-Yong HahnJoo Myung Lee
Keimyung Author(s)
Cho, Yun Kyeong
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
Issued Date
2024
Volume
17
Issue
5
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The Murray law–based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) is an emerging technique that requires only 1 projection of coronary angiography with similar accuracy to quantitative flow ratio (QFR). However, it has not been validated for the evaluation of noninfarct-related artery (non-IRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) settings. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of μFR and the safety of deferring non-IRA lesions with μFR >0.80 in the setting of AMI.

METHODS:
μFR and QFR were analyzed for non-IRA lesions of patients with AMI enrolled in the FRAME-AMI trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of Non-Infarction Related Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction), consisting of fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention groups. The diagnostic accuracy of μFR was compared with QFR and FFR. Patients were classified by the non-IRA μFR value of 0.80 as a cutoff value. The primary outcome was a vessel-oriented composite outcome, a composite of cardiac death, non-IRA–related myocardial infarction, and non-IRA–related repeat revascularization.

RESULTS:
μFR and QFR analyses were feasible in 443 patients (552 lesions). μFR showed acceptable correlation with FFR (R=0.777; P<0.001), comparable C-index with QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80 (μFR versus QFR: 0.926 versus 0.961, P=0.070), and shorter total analysis time (mean, 32.7 versus 186.9 s; P<0.001). Non-IRA with μFR >0.80 and deferred percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than non-IRA with performed percutaneous coronary intervention (3.4% versus 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14–0.99]; P=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS:
In patients with multivessel AMI, μFR of non-IRA showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80. Deferred non-IRA with μFR >0.80 showed a lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than revascularized non-IRA.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
조윤경
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1941-7640
Source
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013844
DOI
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013844
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45737
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.