Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery
- Author(s)
- Woochan Kwon; Ki Hong Choi; Seung Hun Lee; David Hong; Doosup Shin; Hyun Kuk Kim; Keun Ho Park; Eun Ho Choo; Chan Joon Kim; Min Chul Kim; Young Joon Hong; Sung Gyun Ahn; Joon-Hyung Doh; Sang Yeub Lee; Sang Don Park; Hyun-Jong Lee; Min Gyu Kang; Jin-Sin Koh; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Chang-Wook Nam; Hyun Sung Joh; Taek Kyu Park; Jeong Hoon Yang; Young Bin Song; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Myung Ho Jeong; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Joo-Yong Hahn; Joo Myung Lee
- Keimyung Author(s)
- Cho, Yun Kyeong
- Department
- Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
- Journal Title
- Circ Cardiovasc Interv
- Issued Date
- 2024
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND:
The Murray law–based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) is an emerging technique that requires only 1 projection of coronary angiography with similar accuracy to quantitative flow ratio (QFR). However, it has not been validated for the evaluation of noninfarct-related artery (non-IRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) settings. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of μFR and the safety of deferring non-IRA lesions with μFR >0.80 in the setting of AMI.
METHODS:
μFR and QFR were analyzed for non-IRA lesions of patients with AMI enrolled in the FRAME-AMI trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of Non-Infarction Related Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction), consisting of fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention groups. The diagnostic accuracy of μFR was compared with QFR and FFR. Patients were classified by the non-IRA μFR value of 0.80 as a cutoff value. The primary outcome was a vessel-oriented composite outcome, a composite of cardiac death, non-IRA–related myocardial infarction, and non-IRA–related repeat revascularization.
RESULTS:
μFR and QFR analyses were feasible in 443 patients (552 lesions). μFR showed acceptable correlation with FFR (R=0.777; P<0.001), comparable C-index with QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80 (μFR versus QFR: 0.926 versus 0.961, P=0.070), and shorter total analysis time (mean, 32.7 versus 186.9 s; P<0.001). Non-IRA with μFR >0.80 and deferred percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than non-IRA with performed percutaneous coronary intervention (3.4% versus 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14–0.99]; P=0.048).
CONCLUSIONS:
In patients with multivessel AMI, μFR of non-IRA showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80. Deferred non-IRA with μFR >0.80 showed a lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than revascularized non-IRA.
- 공개 및 라이선스
-
- 파일 목록
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.