계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Status at Transplant in Older Heart Transplant Recipients: Implications for Organ Allocation Policy

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Junho HyunJong-Chan YounJung Ae HongDarae KimJae-Joong KimMyoung Soo KimJaewon OhJin-Jin KimMi-Hyang JungIn-Cheol KimSang-Eun LeeJin Joo ParkMin-Seok KimSung-Ho JungHyun-Jai ChoHae-Young LeeSeok-Min KangDong-Ju ChoiJon A KobashigawaJosef StehlikJin-Oh Choi
Keimyung Author(s)
Kim, In Cheol
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
J Korean Med Sci
Issued Date
2025
Volume
40
Issue
3
Keyword
Heart TransplantationAgeAmbulatory StatusSurvivalOutcome
Abstract
Background:
Shortage of organ donors in the Republic of Korea has become a major problem. To address this, it has been questioned whether heart transplant (HTx) allocation should be modified to reduce priority of older patients. We aimed to evaluate post-HTx outcomes according to recipient age and specific pre-HTx conditions using a nationwide prospective cohort.

Methods:
We analyzed clinical characteristics of 628 patients from the Korean Organ Transplant Registry who received HTx from January 2015 to December 2020. Enrolled recipients were divided into three groups according to age. We also included comorbidities including ambulatory status. Non-ambulatory status was defined as pre-HTx support with either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, continuous renal replacement therapy, or mechanical ventilation.

Results:
Of the 628 patients, 195 were < 50 years, 322 were 50–64 years and 111 were ≥ 65 years at transplant. Four hundred nine (65.1%) were ambulatory and 219 (34.9%) were non-ambulatory. Older recipients tended to have more comorbidities, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and received older donors. Post-HTx survival was significantly lower in older recipients (P = 0.025) and recipients with non-ambulatory status (P < 0.001). However, in contrast to non-ambulatory recipients who showed significant survival differences according to the recipient’s age (P = 0.004), ambulatory recipients showed comparable outcomes (P = 0.465).

Conclusion:
Our results do not support use of age alone as an allocation criterion. Transplant candidate age in combination with some comorbidities such as non-ambulatory status may identify patients at a sufficiently elevated risk at which suitability of HTx should be reconsidered.
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
김인철
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1598-6357
Source
https://jkms.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e14
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e14
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/45980
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.