계명대학교 의학도서관 Repository

Proportion and Clinical Impact of Stent Optimization During Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Trial

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
Hoyun KimDo-Yoon KangJung-Min AhnHwa Jung KimSeung-Ho HurYun-Kyeong ChoCheol Hyun LeeSoon Jun HongSang-Wook KimHoyoun WonJun-Hyok OhYoung Joon HongYong-Hoon YoonSeung-Jung ParkDuk-Woo Park
Keimyung Author(s)
Hur, Seung HoCho, Yun KyeongLee, Cheol Hyun
Department
Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
Journal Title
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Issued Date
2025
Volume
18
Issue
9
Keyword
intravascular ultrasoundoptical coherent tomographypercutaneous coronary interventionstent optimization
Abstract
Background:
Data regarding the proportion and clinical impact of achieving stent optimization by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)– or optical coherence tomography (OCT)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain limited.

Objectives:
The authors assessed the proportion and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without stent optimization using imaging guidance.

Methods:
This secondary analysis of the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial classified patients into optimized (meeting all prespecified optimization criteria) or nonoptimized groups. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

Results:
Among 1,980 patients, 1,022 (51.6%) achieved stent optimization, with a lower proportion in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (467 of 967 [48.3%] vs 555 of 1,013 [54.8%]; P = 0.004). At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, TVF incidence was lower in the optimized group than in the nonoptimized group (39 of 1022 [3.8%] vs 72 of 958 [7.5%]; HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.35-0.77; P < 0.001). The effect of stent optimization on TVF appeared more substantial in OCT-guided PCI (14 of 467 [3.0%] vs 38 of 500 [7.6%]; HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.72) than in IVUS-guided PCI (25 of 555 [4.5%] vs 34 of 458 [7.4%]; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.37-1.05), albeit there was no significant interaction between TVF and imaging modalities (P for interaction = 0.30).

Conclusions:
Stent optimization was achieved in approximately one-half of patients undergoing imaging-guided PCI and was associated with a better clinical outcome. This effect appeared more pronounced in OCT-guided than in IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079)
Keimyung Author(s)(Kor)
허승호
조윤경
이철현
Publisher
School of Medicine (의과대학)
Type
Article
ISSN
1876-7605
Source
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879825005102
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2025.01.436
URI
https://kumel.medlib.dsmc.or.kr/handle/2015.oak/46270
Appears in Collections:
1. School of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고Forever
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.